Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gerda Jacobi's avatar

Thank you for this. I read the opening with a bit of caution (the "vale of tears," "toil and heaviness" language has a history of being used, in certain sovereignty-and-predestination-heavy circles, to tip into a stoic or pietistic submission to suffering, the physical quietly demoted beneath the spiritual, this life something to sit loose to rather than grieve and love at once). But you don't actually go there. The Psalm keeps you honest: sowing in tears and sowing, not despite hope but by means of it. "Sorrowful yet always rejoicing" is the opposite of resignation.

The one thing I'd still want named alongside the toil-and-heaviness frame is the goodness of this life itself; not just as a burden to be endured until glory, but as gift, worth grieving the loss of precisely because it was good. Without that, readers already prone to a Gnostic instinct might hear permission to disengage rather than an invitation to sorrow well. You clearly don't mean that — but the language you're borrowing sometimes carries it in.

I appreciate the balanced perspective you offer here. It's a rare piece that holds grief and hope together without letting either one swallow the other.

No posts

Ready for more?